Its Hard to Choose.....

matanos
Posts: 29

Post by matanos » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:36 pm

deltaboeing84 wrote:I'll show some, but only with permission from George or Martin. It's a respect thing. You don't walk into someones house without asking;).
you are absolutly right to check with martin or george , Thank you for the good news , looking forward to hear some more ... .and to see progress,

and , Martin and George , My Kindly regards , Thank you for your great efforts to make UltraQuality on FS ....
John Thomas
Posts: 5

Post by John Thomas » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:05 pm

with the release of Hong Kong I would really love to see FT come out with a Las Vegas scenery (airport and surrounding area) now this would be fantastic heck even a Central Florida scenery (Orlando area) :)

John
Edge
Posts: 226

Post by Edge » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:12 pm

Is it this one deltaboeing?
Attachments
ZBAA.jpg
ZBAA.jpg (63.29 KiB) Viewed 4252 times
deltaboeing84
Posts: 368

Post by deltaboeing84 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:24 pm

Image

Image

Image

Image

Here ya go guys.
matanos
Posts: 29

Post by matanos » Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:11 pm

deltaboeing84 wrote:Image

Image

Image

Image

Here ya go guys.
WOWWWWWW!!!! My GOD , At last , Beijing Capital Is coming to life in FS .... THANKYOU ALL .... :-)
f15pilotaf
Posts: 83

Post by f15pilotaf » Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:41 pm

Simflyer's put out a PHX, but it's a little out of date with the new terminal and such. It's decent, unless you're using FSX. I'm not sure if it's compatible or not.
MD-Elf
Posts: 12

Post by MD-Elf » Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:52 pm

UK2000 is already creating Heathrow Xtreme since long ago, judging Gatwick Xtreme I think will be pretty awesome, unfortunately no AES :( I also give my vote for Beijing or VHHH; or possibly Malpensa! ISD seems out of date and too cartoonish
guffair25
Posts: 25

Post by guffair25 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:35 pm

*cough* *cough* SAN redue.
MidgeyMidget2
Posts: 1235

Post by MidgeyMidget2 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:58 pm

guffair25 wrote:*cough* *cough* SAN redue.
*cough* *cough* What's wrong with it?
Guy101
Posts: 6

Post by Guy101 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:20 pm

Dont really want to join in and pester the FT team, but lets just think about this logically. I've noticed a few of you asking for sceneries of airports which i've never heard of, so they must be local airports, for FT to make any significant profit, they need to do a scenery which appeals to a wide range of simmers, from around the world, not just where you live.

Some of the sceneries which have been mentioned need not be requested.

Bangkok VTBS - siamavsim is already near completion of VTBS 2008, and if you dont know who siamavsim is, they made the original VTBS 2006 freeware scenery which is now on avsim. So VTBS is crossed of the list.

Beijing - The screenshots above show a well in production scenery of Beijing intl so thats crossed of the list.

Hong Kong VHHH - Thomas Kwong has made a fantastic freeware, and i really dont think FT needs to do anouther version of VHHH, Thomas Kwongs version has very good textures, good buildings and its AES compatible. So thats crossed of the list.

Milan Malpensa - Similar situation to VHHH, amazing freeware scenery, AES compatible and did i mention its free? crossed of the list.

Toronto - There is a pretty decent freeware scenery of Toronto intl on avsim, its got decent textures, its AES compatible and its free, wouldnt it make sense to do anouther canadian airport? crossed of the list.

New York JFK - FSDreamTeam is doing it, simple as, its gunna be amazing, so why request FT to do it? crossed of the list.

Singapore - DING DING DING! we have a winner. Changi is in desperate need of a remake, Samsofts version is showing its age, and its very heavy on FPS, not to mention Changi has changed a lot since samsoft released their version. We have a candidate.

Vancouver - Anouther choice, there is a freeware scenery on avsim, but lets face it, its not very good, so vancouver is a candidate.

Las Vegas - It doest appeal to me, but, its in need of a remake, no scenery shows the airports glory. Anouther candidate.

Amsterdam - Cloud9's scenery is showing its age, and its a FPS monster, but, the scenery will do for now, so its not vital that its remade. Mind you, Aerosoft seems to be shooting european airports out frequently, and considering they've done heathrow, madrid, lisbon, and there about to do paris and stockholm, im sure amsterdam is on their mind.

Seoul - There is a freeware out, and its not amazing quality, so i guess seoul is candidate aswell.

Tokyo - I take it were talking about Narita, for me, it is in need of an upgrade. Overland's version of Narita is looking dated, and has terrible ground textures, so its a candidate.

Kansai - Doesnt need to be requested, overlands version is very good, the only negative is the ground textures which are quite bad to be honest.

Auckland - Im very suprised through my searches that noone has mentioned auckland intl airport, a major airport, which has only one scenery remake which was originally designed for FS2002 and is VERY dated. Clearly a candidate.

Other airports in the UK like Manchester and Gatwick are fine, UK2000 is doing a remake of Manchester, and Gatwick extreme is a decent scenery.

So the most logical sceneries which should be considered are:

1.Singapore Changi
2.Auckland
3.Tokyo Narita
4.Vancouver
5.Las Vegas
6.Seoul


However much i, and almost all of you want your request to be accepted and have the scenery of your choice be made, we all need to realise that its down to FT and what they decide THEY want to do.

So lets give them a break.

Guy :D
guffair25
Posts: 25

Post by guffair25 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:31 pm

MidgeyMidget2 wrote:
guffair25 wrote:*cough* *cough* SAN redue.
*cough* *cough* What's wrong with it?
*cough* *cough* I didnt say anything was wrong with it. I would love to see it done again with the skills they have now.
martin[flytampa]
Site Admin


Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Posts: 2527
Location: Tampa/FL
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:21 am Post subject:
Not likely for KSAN because the "codebase" of it is outdated. KSAN is a candidate that I would consider redoing from scratch like KTPA tho.
I stand behind 100% As I am sure a ton of FT fans would love to see.
skydvdan
Posts: 2121

Post by skydvdan » Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:56 am

Guy101 wrote:Dont really want to join in and pester the FT team, but lets just think about this logically. I've noticed a few of you asking for sceneries of airports which i've never heard of, so they must be local airports, for FT to make any significant profit, they need to do a scenery which appeals to a wide range of simmers, from around the world, not just where you live.

Some of the sceneries which have been mentioned need not be requested.

Bangkok VTBS - siamavsim is already near completion of VTBS 2008, and if you dont know who siamavsim is, they made the original VTBS 2006 freeware scenery which is now on avsim. So VTBS is crossed of the list.

Beijing - The screenshots above show a well in production scenery of Beijing intl so thats crossed of the list.

Hong Kong VHHH - Thomas Kwong has made a fantastic freeware, and i really dont think FT needs to do anouther version of VHHH, Thomas Kwongs version has very good textures, good buildings and its AES compatible. So thats crossed of the list.

Milan Malpensa - Similar situation to VHHH, amazing freeware scenery, AES compatible and did i mention its free? crossed of the list.

Toronto - There is a pretty decent freeware scenery of Toronto intl on avsim, its got decent textures, its AES compatible and its free, wouldnt it make sense to do anouther canadian airport? crossed of the list.

New York JFK - FSDreamTeam is doing it, simple as, its gunna be amazing, so why request FT to do it? crossed of the list.

Singapore - DING DING DING! we have a winner. Changi is in desperate need of a remake, Samsofts version is showing its age, and its very heavy on FPS, not to mention Changi has changed a lot since samsoft released their version. We have a candidate.

Vancouver - Anouther choice, there is a freeware scenery on avsim, but lets face it, its not very good, so vancouver is a candidate.

Las Vegas - It doest appeal to me, but, its in need of a remake, no scenery shows the airports glory. Anouther candidate.

Amsterdam - Cloud9's scenery is showing its age, and its a FPS monster, but, the scenery will do for now, so its not vital that its remade. Mind you, Aerosoft seems to be shooting european airports out frequently, and considering they've done heathrow, madrid, lisbon, and there about to do paris and stockholm, im sure amsterdam is on their mind.

Seoul - There is a freeware out, and its not amazing quality, so i guess seoul is candidate aswell.

Tokyo - I take it were talking about Narita, for me, it is in need of an upgrade. Overland's version of Narita is looking dated, and has terrible ground textures, so its a candidate.

Kansai - Doesnt need to be requested, overlands version is very good, the only negative is the ground textures which are quite bad to be honest.

Auckland - Im very suprised through my searches that noone has mentioned auckland intl airport, a major airport, which has only one scenery remake which was originally designed for FS2002 and is VERY dated. Clearly a candidate.

Other airports in the UK like Manchester and Gatwick are fine, UK2000 is doing a remake of Manchester, and Gatwick extreme is a decent scenery.

So the most logical sceneries which should be considered are:

1.Singapore Changi
2.Auckland
3.Tokyo Narita
4.Vancouver
5.Las Vegas
6.Seoul


However much i, and almost all of you want your request to be accepted and have the scenery of your choice be made, we all need to realise that its down to FT and what they decide THEY want to do.

So lets give them a break.

Guy :D
Your logic is a little off. Remember that there are two sims to choose from these days. You seem to pretty much just be speaking for the FS2004 guys. Personally I don't care what comes next because I know either way it'll be a quality product. Again, personally I think developers like FT are being generous by building for two sims. It wouldn't be hard to force people to upgrade to FSX by designing solely for it. Twice the work you know. Somehow I doubt Hong Kong would have taken 14 months to build if Martin didn't have to design two of them. Just a thought. :wink:
martin[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 5199

Post by martin[flytampa] » Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:27 am

Speculation about our scenery choices and words like "logic" are hard to blend :)
skydvdan
Posts: 2121

Post by skydvdan » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:23 am

martin[flytampa] wrote:Speculation about our scenery choices and words like "logic" are hard to blend :)
This is true. That's why I find it easier to just talk about the "easy" projects like "Ride Trampy". The logic is pretty straight forward. There's an update on the beta testing here.
Post Reply