Of course, no one doubts that FSX will go anytime within the decade, its way too good a sim (but, FS9 is now done. ); honestly, its mainly FS9 users who have aged/limited system capabilities (or simply don't know how correclty configure their systems) that are constantly complaining everywhere, on every forum.george[flytampa] wrote:I doubt its fair because FSX users know their sim isn't endangered.
A-MEN! Your correct, *FSWhining/FS9ing* has to end soon, very soon hopefully!I'm not anti-FS9, just anti dual development. Now with a third version coming out, there's no way I'll cope developing for three platforms. Even now FS9 DOES hold back FSX development somewhat. I simplify design methods to retain fs9 compatibility later on. This has to come to an end soon.
LMAOI'll attempt a FS9 port of Athens (if possible because the trench/highway might cause problems), but in the future, its highly unlikely I'll consider another FS9 version. Its just too old.
...as I said before, which "somehow" got removed (probably due to "FSWhining/FS9ing" ), there goes FS9 development.
Well, I'm sure this will get them all stired-up again, George... I just want to make it clear, its about time that "South Park" stops holding up the best that FS has to offer for constants complaints about FPS; that argument is old, tired, & now completely moot; even with today's low-cost, high-end systems, that can be purchased, setup, and enjoyed for just the cost of a *typical* college text book.
FSX TOTALLY ROCKS!