Board index » FlyTampa » General Discussion

Re: Update & new plans

Postby dom63 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 5:19 am

Montreal in production ? Thanks dear god

I will promote this as much as i can !
Dom
dom63
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Update & new plans

Postby MidgeyMidget2 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:03 am

Applejacks628 wrote:I'd probably make a decent drill sergeant.


Aha...ahahaha..........ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Yeah, it was definitely those stern words that shut everyone up. Man you are tough.
Image
MidgeyMidget2
Posts: 1215
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:01 pm

Re: Update & new plans

Postby guffair25 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:19 pm

Little Rock was never released by OSS, so I would say KLIT. It will never happen, but I can dream. Since you were talking about smaller airports.
guffair25
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:43 am

Re: Update & new plans

Postby LCLK » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:18 pm

I would like to see LKPR. There is heavy traffic and small aircraft.. lot of other airport to fly to/from. As i don't have much time to fly would be ideal to fly around LKPR to Germany or to the new LGAV with CSA A320s or Travel Service 737s.
LCLK
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 7:07 am

Re: Update & new plans

Postby wideloadwhitford » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:53 pm

I like the ideas that you come up with Fly Tampa, however my alter ego does not agree. Why did you guys want to lean more to toward Europe and Asia? I know someone will not agree with what I say but how about Salt Lake City? I wonder when its time will come when this can be made. I live in Florida so this isn't my home airport but the area where it rests between the mountain ranges is rather interesting. I guess it will take much time on your part FT?



I also wish Intersim or LatinVFR will grow some b@lls and make Miami already.

Thanks, Ryan
wideloadwhitford
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:35 pm

Re: Update & new plans

Postby george[flytampa] » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:07 pm

wideloadwhitford wrote:I like the ideas that you come up with Fly Tampa, however my alter ego does not agree. Why did you guys want to lean more to toward Europe and Asia? I know someone will not agree with what I say but how about Salt Lake City? I wonder when its time will come when this can be made. I live in Florida so this isn't my home airport but the area where it rests between the mountain ranges is rather interesting. I guess it will take much time on your part FT?



I also wish Intersim or LatinVFR will grow some balls and make Miami already.

Thanks, Ryan

Salt Lake won't sell very well. I'm sure its a nice airport in a beautiful area, but without international traffic, it'll be a flop.
george[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 2302
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: Update & new plans

Postby Global Express » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:13 pm

CYUL.... home of the Global Express... fantastic!!!!! I'm sold already, as long as there's an FS9 copy. :)
Global Express
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:27 am

Re: Update & new plans

Postby george[flytampa] » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:27 pm

I've not fully decided FS9's fate yet.
I'm already facing decisions on Montreal where FS9 is holding back the FSX version. It's becoming highly frustrating.

Surley that 737NGX is reason to dump FS9 alone??? After watching Nick's stunning video even the most stubborn FS9er must be reaching for the FSX DVD.

http://www.flyaoamedia.com/aoa/nicks-73 ... -thoughts/

Performance with complex aircraft & scenery in FSX is finally here..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_P0CSjz ... re=feedlik
george[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 2302
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: Update & new plans

Postby MidgeyMidget2 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:04 pm

george[flytampa] wrote:I've not fully decided FS9's fate yet.
I'm already facing decisions on Montreal where FS9 is holding back the FSX version. It's becoming highly frustrating.

Surley that 737NGX is reason to dump FS9 alone??? After watching Nick's stunning video even the most stubborn FS9er must be reaching for the FSX DVD.

http://www.flyaoamedia.com/aoa/nicks-73 ... -thoughts/

Performance with complex aircraft & scenery in FSX is finally here..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_P0CSjz ... re=feedlik


I think part of the problem now is the impending release of Flight. Do people that have held out on FSX upgrade now (perhaps their entire system) just to maybe upgrade to Flight when that is released? From previews and developer interviews, Flight sounds promising and hopefully won't be beleaguered by the problems FSX was on release. That said, I expect there won't be compatibility with FSX addons for Flight so it becomes a bit of a tricky situation for some people.
Image
MidgeyMidget2
Posts: 1215
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:01 pm

Re: Update & new plans

Postby MrAviator512 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:32 pm

Im Thinking Of Getting TPA And TNCM......... Do They Come Boxed Or Do You Download Them?
MrAviator512
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:24 pm
Location: Sarasota, FL

Re: Update & new plans

Postby george[flytampa] » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:44 pm

MrAviator512 wrote:Im Thinking Of Getting TPA And TNCM......... Do They Come Boxed Or Do You Download Them?

Those two are download only I think.
george[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 2302
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: Update & new plans

Postby dal4215 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:46 pm

george[flytampa] wrote:
wideloadwhitford wrote:I like the ideas that you come up with Fly Tampa, however my alter ego does not agree. Why did you guys want to lean more to toward Europe and Asia? I know someone will not agree with what I say but how about Salt Lake City? I wonder when its time will come when this can be made. I live in Florida so this isn't my home airport but the area where it rests between the mountain ranges is rather interesting. I guess it will take much time on your part FT?



I also wish Intersim or LatinVFR will grow some balls and make Miami already.

Thanks, Ryan

Salt Lake won't sell very well. I'm sure its a nice airport in a beautiful area, but without international traffic, it'll be a flop.


Not to be disrespectful at all, but I think you are wrong. There have been soo many forum posts in just about every FS forum about a SLC scenery. You would be surprised at how many people would jump on that scenery. SLC online sees about 60 flights a day where SAN only sees about 30 - 40 flights a day. If there is a scenery for SAN and that little traffic, why not one for SLC when its got more traffic?

Thanks!
dal4215
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 2:10 am

Re: Update & new plans

Postby airbuspilot95 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 4:04 pm

Prague would be great for the future! The Traffic is very interesting at this airport!
airbuspilot95
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:39 am

Re: Update & new plans

Postby Sluggy » Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:08 am

Make whatever you like George. CYUL is fine with me.

However, I INSIST that you make Alice Springs (YBAS) airport in the Red Centre of Australia this year (my home airport). Served by QANTAS Airlink and Tiger (if they ever get off the ground again). The only major (ahem) airport between Darwin and Adelaide. FS9 and FSX have cruelly neglected this important hub in the Australian continent, and I beleive you're just the guy to right this wrong. Bugger yer US and Euro megahubs, Alice Springs is the one airport that will bind all the disparate tribes in the FS world together in one great cosmic love-in.

You know it makes sense. :D

Cheers from sunny Australia, SLuggy
Sluggy
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:33 pm

Re: Update & new plans

Postby Mike... » Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:51 am

george[flytampa] wrote:
BodoM wrote:Hello George,

my favourite airport I would like to see done by FlyTampa is not on the list, it is KIAH. :P Maybe an airport worth to consider in the future.

So regarding your list I vote for Montreal CYUL. As long as you offer a version for FS9 aswell I'll buy it for sure. 8)

Hey Bodo, long time.
I'm quite keen on Dulles. It'll be a strong contender after Montreal.
Yep, Montreal is in production now.

KIAH is Houston, Dulles would be KIAD. KIAH could use a new scenery, KIAD does not. IMHO.

As for CYUL, looking forward to that one, as FS9 version, the iFly 737 suits my needs, I will not be reaching for my FSX DVDs, like, ever.

I understand it makes it more frustrating for you, but well done addon sceneries still sell well for FS9. Although I'm not wanting to start a discussion about that.

:wink:
Mike...
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 9:52 am