Denver

Post Reply
CSTT-KLAS
Posts: 249

Denver

Post by CSTT-KLAS » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:19 pm

For you next airport http://denverurbanism.com/

thanks
cosnowboarder_777
Posts: 4

Re: Denver

Post by cosnowboarder_777 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:16 pm

Thats pretty cool, I had no idea that they were planning a redevelopment for DIA looks nice.
juniormafia27
Posts: 23

Re: Denver

Post by juniormafia27 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:32 pm

Oh yeah that has been in the works. Another reason why you should do that airport
tictac_
Posts: 1

Re: Denver

Post by tictac_ » Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:52 pm

I agree!

I've been looking to buy a great DIA addon for ages. I cannot believe it hasn't been done yet (the ones out there are mediocre at best).

With 52+ million passengers a year (11th in the world), a major hub for Frontier Airlines, United and Southwest and its steadily growing number of international flights, I think it's about time.

If you decide to do it, please include Denver downtown and its new Union Station area plus the terminal expansion at DIA. Both are currently U/C.


South Terminal Redevelopment:
http://business.flydenver.com/bizops/so ... /index.asp (info)
http://www.gensler.com/#projects/378 (architect and renderings)

Denver Union Station Redevelopment:
http://www.denverunionstation.org/ (info and renderings etc)
http://www.denverinfill.com (blog w/ updates)

Pictures

DIA
Image
Image
Image
Image

Downtown
Image
Image
Image
Image
davidmool
Posts: 1

Re: Denver

Post by davidmool » Sat Dec 12, 2020 12:30 pm

cool
CX 747-400
Posts: 129

Re: Denver

Post by CX 747-400 » Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:34 pm

WOW.... someone had to go digging for an posting from 2013.

If you want a great version of Denver, go over to Flightbeam... https://www.flightbeam.net/kden.html/
george[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 3525

Re: Denver

Post by george[flytampa] » Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:36 pm

It was just a bot
Elliot Negrón
Posts: 33

Re: Denver

Post by Elliot Negrón » Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:43 am

@CX 747-400

How rude of you to brazenly link to competitors work like that! A certain degree of respect is given to the developers here, please ensure you conduct yourself in a respectful manner. I am sure that you wouldn't want someone to come to your house and boast how good their own house is etc.
george[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 3525

Re: Denver

Post by george[flytampa] » Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:11 am

Elliot Negrón wrote:
Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:43 am
@CX 747-400

How rude of you to brazenly link to competitors work like that! A certain degree of respect is given to the developers here, please ensure you conduct yourself in a respectful manner. I am sure that you wouldn't want someone to come to your house and boast how good their own house is etc.
Its fine. We get on really well with Flightbeam.
Elliot Negrón
Posts: 33

Re: Denver

Post by Elliot Negrón » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:11 am

george[flytampa] wrote:
Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:11 am
Its fine. We get on really well with Flightbeam.
[/quote]

Okay sure but CX 747-400 should definitely show a bit more respect here, err on the side of caution etc.
scotth6
Posts: 8

Re: Denver

Post by scotth6 » Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:08 am

Elliot Negrón wrote:
Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:11 am
george[flytampa] wrote:
Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:11 am
Its fine. We get on really well with Flightbeam.
Okay sure but CX 747-400 should definitely show a bit more respect here, err on the side of caution etc.
[/quote]

Mate, if FlyTampa even had a version of Denver then I would understand your concern, but they don't.
CX 747-400
Posts: 129

Re: Denver

Post by CX 747-400 » Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:48 pm

Elliot Negrón wrote:
Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:43 am
@CX 747-400

How rude of you to brazenly link to competitors work like that! A certain degree of respect is given to the developers here, please ensure you conduct yourself in a respectful manner. I am sure that you wouldn't want someone to come to your house and boast how good their own house is etc.
Elliott,

I am guessing that you are new to the flight sim community. We are one giant community that helps out each other. What if the person that I was responding to had never heard of Flight Beam, and was stuck using default scenery, and was begging and pleading for a quality scenery to be made when it already exists.

There is nothing "rude" with telling someone about a great product on another developers website. It is not like FlyTampa has a Denver product available or has announced one. I would do the same thing on any other developers website if there was another product available elsewhere.

And, by the way, I have shown FlyTampa plenty of respect in the best way possible.... I own almost all of the sceneries that they have made since 2006. Can you say that?
Post Reply