Miami Version 1.6

Dillon
Posts: 109

Post by Dillon » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:30 pm

Wow Martin, I'm not getting that at all... :-(
specialist
Posts: 394

Post by specialist » Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:50 am

Dillon wrote:Wow Martin, I'm not getting that at all... :-(
Are you using UT USA. if so you will need to disable a few features and you will see autogen come back up. :?
Dillon
Posts: 109

Post by Dillon » Fri Sep 30, 2005 11:59 pm

I had UT USA installed at one point and uninstalled it later (hated the way Hawaii looked and the decrease in sim performance on my system). Something could still be there though after the uninstal. I'm not using any add-on mesh, the scenery is all default...
truthknown
Posts: 26

Post by truthknown » Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:43 pm

I am getting very bad ground texture flickering now with this update in dusk time periods. I did not notice this during the day or at night, only at sundown. I didnt try at sunrise.

Chris
martin[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 5190

Post by martin[flytampa] » Wed Oct 05, 2005 11:51 pm

Is that flickering with Ultimate terrain maybe?
truthknown
Posts: 26

Post by truthknown » Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:09 pm

No, i dont have any other addons in the area.
Dillon
Posts: 109

Post by Dillon » Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:52 am

O.K. Martin I checked and checked in my setup and found no scenery that's conflicting with FT's KMIA. I disabled KMIA and the autogen came back for the default KMIA. Re-enabled FlyTampa's KMIA and the autogen was gone in the area pictured above... :-(
martin[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 5190

Post by martin[flytampa] » Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:08 am

Dillon: Perhaps delete the Fly-Miami /scenery/ folder completely. Then reinstall whatever original Miami you have and then update directly to 1.6 (Doesn't matter if you update from 1.0-1.2). I don't know if this will help but the 1.6 update does add, replace and also deletes a number of files from previous versions... perhaps one of them didn't get deleted or so.
Dillon
Posts: 109

Post by Dillon » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:48 am

Martin sorry it took me so long to reply....

It seems per your suggestion I gained about 2 or 3 extra trees but that's about it. All the autogen buildings are still no where to be found when looking west from Rwy 8R. :-(
Northeastern292
Posts: 11

Post by Northeastern292 » Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:45 pm

Does the Aerosoft U.S. Airports CD version 3.1 come with the v1.6 upgrade?
joe308
Posts: 2

Non Standard Install

Post by joe308 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:20 pm

Martin

I have a non-standard installation path for my FS9. I'm not sure which version of FlyTampa Miami I have but I would assume it's the original.

I tried to install the v1.6 update and I have no idea where the files are going? The auto-installer gives me no manual option to install in the proper place and after the installer 'does it's thing' I go back into the Miami scenery and nothing has changed.

Any suggestions?

JoeT
martin[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 5190

Post by martin[flytampa] » Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:16 pm

The update will install in the path where you originally installed Miami, regardles if you moved the files around afterwards.

You can do a Windows-search for a file called:

conc_9.bgl

Whereever you find this, thats where the update went. If you don't find it anywhere the update didn't run properly, in which case however it should have given you a message like "can't find previous installation of Miami".

If you find the update files (conc_9.bgl etc) copying them over isn't the best solution since the update program does more then that and also deletes files etc. Best is to install whatever original version you have (1.2 or so) and then run the update again.
joe308
Posts: 2

V1.6 UPD

Post by joe308 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:05 pm

Tk U for ur assistance.

I've 'tracked' down the original folder - don't ask :| - and the update looks to have installed properly. At least it resembles the MIA I spend a good portion of my younger life flying in and out of. Tks for all ur assistance and keep up the splendid work.

JoeT
11jovic
Posts: 4

hi there

Post by 11jovic » Thu Jul 24, 2008 4:28 am

the first pictures shows alot of traffic is that from traffic 2005 because i use that and if it is as good as that i will get it.

Kind regards joe
Locked