FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post Reply
emilios[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 1623

FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by emilios[flytampa] » Sat Oct 07, 2023 10:08 pm

GSX Pro profile for flyAmsterdam for Microsoft Flight Simulator
also available here: https://flightsim.to/file/68895/officia ... ro-profile

current version: v1.11 (MAY24)

Changelog GSX Pro SPL 1.11
tweaked some pushback routes gates
added a few K apron stands
py file coding for faster and robust error handling of wrong aircraft cfg files

Changelog GSX Pro SPL 1.10

GSX Pro Push and Pull function: lot of gates and routes changed according real life gates with push and pull
H gates added push and hold routine to vop G71 stand
Added taxi line number in pushback or push pull description for ATC convenient
Added and changed=< Cat4 into =<Medium and => Cat5 into => Heavy into the description
Added FSS 190/195 and the inibuilds A300 placements at AMS
Added compatibility drag and drop installer from https://elevatesolutions.live/DDI_pages/DDIOverview/
Removed Schengen in sorting menu GSX
More logical and simplified grouping in GSX menu for faster navigation
Small tweaks

Changelog GSX Pro SPL 1.09

- Handlers and Catering companies adjustments
- D Platform adjustments pushback trucks
- A Platform added stop positions in the PY file for the Ejet family (FSS 170/175)
- A Platform adjusted stop positions
- H Pier Menzies default handler
- Gate letter also added in description of the GSX Menu
- Small tweaks

version: v1.07 (10OCT23)
Changelog 1.07 GSX Profile for Flytampa Amsterdam:
- All gates/stands are adjusted and more tweaked and aligned with the scenery center lines
- Few stop positions also corrected
- Catering KLM_White primary at those gates and KL removed
- Adjusted stop postions for C-Pier and D Pier where missing and added for the PMDG 737-6/7/8/9
- Manual text added and adjusted for the option item tips added

release version: v1.05 (8OCT23)


* if you want to avoid all VDGS loading but just the active user aircraft change this line disable_static_docks = 0 to 1 in the eham_flytampa.ini file
Attachments
FT_EHAM_GSX Pro SPL 1.11.zip
(58.82 KiB) Downloaded 107 times
olafie
Posts: 32

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by olafie » Mon Oct 16, 2023 1:23 am

Please add the stands adjacent to KB taxiway as well!
slicker55
Posts: 1

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by slicker55 » Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:27 am

After all your hard work, congratulations on the release of EHAM (day-1purchase) and thank you for providing this GSX profile
emilios[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 1623

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by emilios[flytampa] » Sun Oct 22, 2023 8:14 am

slicker55 wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 12:27 am After all your hard work, congratulations on the release of EHAM (day-1purchase) and thank you for providing this GSX profile
thank you!
Mulder01
Posts: 1

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by Mulder01 » Sat Dec 16, 2023 5:44 pm

Hi,

I've purchased FlyTampa EHAM through the MSFS Marketplace (which was a first and last time) and now I can't get the GSX profile to work. I've tried to let GSX create a new INI file as described on several forums, but these files do not contain an 'Afcad_path' nor does the INI file as provided here. Is there any workaround to get the GSX profile working when purchased through marketplace? Thanks!!

Regards,
Ard

EDIT: disregard message above as it works just fine. An old freeware version in my community folder was causing things not to work. Feel free to delete this post.
LucaFormula2608
Posts: 1

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by LucaFormula2608 » Thu Dec 21, 2023 1:59 pm

HI, i have the problem that i can not see vdgs, only the one from the Airport, i try to reinstall but i can not see them. Do you know why?
olafie
Posts: 32

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by olafie » Mon Dec 25, 2023 12:54 am

Will this be updated to reflect the push/pull procedures at EHAM?
awf1
Posts: 35

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by awf1 » Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:50 am

Yes in the progress to update all the latest features and push and pull after christmas
Flying Fred
Posts: 2

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by Flying Fred » Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:30 am

I have installed the GSX Flytampa Amsterdam profiles as described.
What I find at gate D 54 that everything is working, but the pushback is a bit off.
It gives me the pushback NE instead of E and places me off to the NE of the taxiway of the terminal.
How does this occur and how can I change this in the right direction?

Kind regards,

Fred
imatams
Posts: 20

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by imatams » Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:30 pm

Flying Fred wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:30 am I have installed the GSX Flytampa Amsterdam profiles as described.
What I find at gate D 54 that everything is working, but the pushback is a bit off.
It gives me the pushback NE instead of E and places me off to the NE of the taxiway of the terminal.
How does this occur and how can I change this in the right direction?

Kind regards,

Fred
Hi, a pushback from D54 is not supposed to be on the yellow line. It should be on the white 'pushback' line that is slightly angled compared to the yellow line of TWY A9. So if its correct on the white line (I believe it is) then it's correct.
Flying Fred
Posts: 2

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by Flying Fred » Sun Dec 31, 2023 7:38 am

imatams wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:30 pm
Flying Fred wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:30 am I have installed the GSX Flytampa Amsterdam profiles as described.
What I find at gate D 54 that everything is working, but the pushback is a bit off.
It gives me the pushback NE instead of E and places me off to the NE of the taxiway of the terminal.
How does this occur and how can I change this in the right direction?

Kind regards,

Fred
Hi, a pushback from D54 is not supposed to be on the yellow line. It should be on the white 'pushback' line that is slightly angled compared to the yellow line of TWY A9. So if its correct on the white line (I believe it is) then it's correct.
Thanks for your reply! Yes, indeed it is set on the white line facing NE. Could you also tell why this is? Because the VATSIM or IVAO controlers always request pushback facing E.

Kind regards,

Fred
olafie
Posts: 32

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by olafie » Mon Jan 01, 2024 1:20 am

The white line is the pushback limit line. So this is east enough when the controller tells you 'face east'.
awf1
Posts: 35

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by awf1 » Mon Jan 15, 2024 10:53 am

Flying Fred wrote: Sun Dec 31, 2023 7:38 am
imatams wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:30 pm
Flying Fred wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:30 am I have installed the GSX Flytampa Amsterdam profiles as described.
What I find at gate D 54 that everything is working, but the pushback is a bit off.
It gives me the pushback NE instead of E and places me off to the NE of the taxiway of the terminal.
How does this occur and how can I change this in the right direction?

Kind regards,

Fred
Hi, a pushback from D54 is not supposed to be on the yellow line. It should be on the white 'pushback' line that is slightly angled compared to the yellow line of TWY A9. So if its correct on the white line (I believe it is) then it's correct.
Thanks for your reply! Yes, indeed it is set on the white line facing NE. Could you also tell why this is? Because the VATSIM or IVAO controlers always request pushback facing E.

Kind regards,

Fred
Pushbacks (Push and Pull) are 100% according to real life at the correct stop position. When they request facing east you can choose in this example (facing NE) and you will be at the correct stop.
Luuminator
Posts: 1

Re: FlyTampa Amsterdam [GSX Pro]

Post by Luuminator » Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:42 pm

Hello I just recently bought and installed FlyTampa Amsterdam and installed the gsx profile. Unfortunately every time I attempt pushback I get a coatl scripting engine error for pushback.py. I have attempted pushback at other custom airports since I got this error at Amsterdam and pushback worked at them.
the log due to it stating attachments can not be uploaded
emulateText_MSFS [GSX] Departure clearance requested 2.0
MSFS always use CheckIcingConditionsSimple() + surface condition
Icing test = 0 8.96157836914 False
MSFS always use CheckIcingConditionsSimple() + surface condition
Icing test = 0 8.96157836914 False
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ".\common\fsm.py", line 73, in executeDoFuncToCompletion
File ".\GSX\assistanceServices\pushBack.py", line 457, in do
AttributeError: 'PushBack' object has no attribute 'walkerVehicleSpawnPoint'
{'Airport': 'EHAM', 'Requested assistance services at': 'D-Pier => Heavy | Gate D53 ', 'Requested parking services to': 'D-Pier => Heavy | Gate D53 ', 'User Pos': (52.310058336213686, 4.772400000000088, 1.47903 m, 4.5726 m, 183.00043151114548, 0.024033586429130633, 0.02356194518506527, 0.00032193629871013545, 4.456175965118408, 1.0)}


EDIT was able to fix. Had to completely uninstall gsx, and delete all folders associated with gsx
Post Reply